United States v. Jan Dil Khan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing mistrial granted because of the jury's inability to agree on a verdict with mistrial granted on defendant's request following error in conduct of trial
• \operations of narcotics dealers are a proper subject for expert testimony under Fed.R.Evid. 702\ and \more than satisf[y] the minimal relevancy standards of Fed.R.Evid. 401\
• “operations of narcotics dealers' are a proper subject for expert testimony under Fed.R.Evid. 702” and “more than satisf[y] the minimal relevancy standards of Fed.R.Evid. 401”
• “There is no constitutional right to prison wages and any such 1 compensation is by the grace of the state.”
• evidence of price of heroin, dress of drug dealers, and transactions in Pakistan admissible to rebut defendant’s argument that he was a poor man rather than a major drug dealer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).