United States v. Jamiel Chagra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that other courts have required at least three violations for a \continuing series\
• noting that courts have required three or more violations to constitute a \continuing series\
• finding no double jeopardy violation where the charged offenses occurred during different times, the participants were different, the places differed, and the evidence used to prove the offenses differed
• finding no double jeopardy violation where -30- the charged offenses occurred during different times, the participants were different, the places differed, and the evidence used to prove the offenses differed
• finding no double jeopardy violation where -30- the charged offenses occurred during different times, the participants were different, the places differed, and the evidence used to prove the offenses differed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).