Skip to main content
· 3/16/2005

United States v. James William Rogers

Citations

  • 400 F.3d 640
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4303
  • 2005 WL 600356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a district court must explain any extraordinary or atypical factors justifying a departure for extraordinary post-offense rehabilitation and refusing to justify the departure for Rogers on that basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melloy, Bowman, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.