Skip to main content
· 3/18/1959

United States v. James William Prince

Citations

  • 264 F.2d 850
  • 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for failure to instruct on procuring agent theory as to facilitating a sale under § 174, although such instruction had been given as to sale counts
  • reversing for failure to instruct on procuring agent theory as to facilitating a sale under § 174, although such instruction had been given as to sale counts
  • the refusal of trial court to charge that if the jury found that the defendant acted on behalf of the government agent purchaser and purchased drug from a third person with whom he was not associated, defendant was not guilty of any violation with which he was charged
  • as to the charge of facilitation of sale
  • dictum as to sale under § 174
  • dictum as to sale under § 174

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs, Goodrich, McLAUGHLIN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.