· 3/18/1959
United States v. James William Prince
Citations
- 264 F.2d 850
- 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing for failure to instruct on procuring agent theory as to facilitating a sale under § 174, although such instruction had been given as to sale counts
- reversing for failure to instruct on procuring agent theory as to facilitating a sale under § 174, although such instruction had been given as to sale counts
- the refusal of trial court to charge that if the jury found that the defendant acted on behalf of the government agent purchaser and purchased drug from a third person with whom he was not associated, defendant was not guilty of any violation with which he was charged
- as to the charge of facilitation of sale
- dictum as to sale under § 174
- dictum as to sale under § 174
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biggs, Goodrich, McLAUGHLIN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.