United States v. James William Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Puffing, boasts, and other conversation . . . are admissible when used by the declarant to obtain the confidence of one involved in the conspiracy.’”
• prosecutor may not introduce evidence for the primary purpose of placing before the jury substantive evidence otherwise inadmissable
• prosecutor may not introduce evidence for the primary purpose of placing before the jury substantive evidence otherwise inadmissable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).