United States v. James William Broyles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the release of grand jury minutes even after the defendant was indicted and prosecuted
• finding sufficient evidence that subjects of video were in fact under the age of eighteen when, among other things, videotape was viewed by jury which could draw its own conclusions as to age of subjects
• finding sufficient evidence that subjects of video were in fact under the age of eighteen when, among other things, videotape was viewed by jury which could draw its own conclusions as to age of subjects
• finding sufficient evidence that subjects of video were in fact under the age of eighteen when, among other things, videotape was viewed by jury which could draw its own conclusions as to age of subjects
• “It is well-established that a showing of a ‘particularized need’ is necessary before the court will accede to . . . a release [of grand-jury matters].”
• abuse-of-discretion standard of review; movant must show particularized need for disclosure of minutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).