United States v. James Wilder, II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is not conceivable to us that the copying of all, or substantially all, of a copyrighted song can be a ‘fair use’ merely because the infringer had no intent to infringe.”
• “[I]t is not conceivable to us that the copying of all, or substantially all, of a copyrighted song can be a ‘fair use’ merely because the infringer had no intent to infringe.”
• “[I]t is not conceivable to us that the copying of all, or substantially all, of a copyrighted song can be a ‘fair use’ merely because the infringer had no intent to infringe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).