· 1/23/2004
United States v. James Wilbur Scruggs, A/K/A Pretty, A/K/A J
Citations
- 356 F.3d 539
- 63 Fed. R. Serv. 464
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1032
- 2004 WL 103304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressly noting that the district court had accepted both the guilty plea and the plea agreement before the alleged breach
- expected benefits from plea agreement are not based on defendant’s subjective beliefs regarding utility of them cooperation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Wilkinson, Motz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.