Skip to main content
· 1/23/2004

United States v. James Wilbur Scruggs, A/K/A Pretty, A/K/A J

Citations

  • 356 F.3d 539
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 464
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1032
  • 2004 WL 103304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressly noting that the district court had accepted both the guilty plea and the plea agreement before the alleged breach
  • expected benefits from plea agreement are not based on defendant’s subjective beliefs regarding utility of them cooperation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Wilkinson, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.