Skip to main content
· 5/3/1991

United States v. James W. Wade

Citations

  • 931 F.2d 300
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8626
  • 1991 WL 70228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, even if a judge meets the recusal standard test, this fact alone may not be sufficient for ordering a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Henley, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.