United States v. James W. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he court has the discretion to limit cross-examination once the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to establish the potential bias of the accomplice-witness has been satisfied.”
• discussing particulars of Aceto’s 1976 plea agreement with the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).