United States v. James v. Canestri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discovery of additional contraband was within the authorized scope.of the search because the officers were “still looking” for the subject of the search warrant
• court held that a locked basement storage room in the house was part of the house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).