United States v. James Trigg, Todd Warren and Stephen C. Krex

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “victims may not recover [through restitution] an amount in excess of their loss”
• stating that departures in the criminal history category are generally reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• finding that multiple defendants may be held jointly and severally liable for restitution in different amounts, but victims may not recover an amount in excess of their loss
• affirming restitution orders for full amount of loss made joint and several with co-defendants who had been ordered to pay restitution for some, but not all, of full amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).