United States v. James Thomas Cherry, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when an equivocal request for counsel is made, the scope of interrogation must be limited to clarification
• holding that when an equivocal request for counsel is made, the scope of interrogation must be limited to clarification
• limited questioning permitted to clarify whether ambiguous conduct was intended to invoke right to silence
• “ ‘ “Maybe I should talk to an attorney before I make a further statement,” ’ ” and “ ‘Why should I not get an attorney?’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).