United States v. James Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a “defendant is entitled to have access to any prospective witness although such right of access may not lead to an actual interview”
• noting that the criminal defendant’s right of access to any potential witness may not lead to an actual interview
• stating that “the prosecution has no right to interfere with or prevent a defendant’s access to a witness (absent any overriding interest in security)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).