Skip to main content
· 9/8/1988

United States v. James Sam Marr

Citations

  • 856 F.2d 1471
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12182
  • 1988 WL 92197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the requirement that a district court “must indicate that the court reviewed the records in the case”
  • finding no hearing 2 The Court liberally construes Defendant’s Motion to include the arguments set forth in the letter from his appellate counsel. Cf. United States v. Guerrero, 488 F.3d 1313, 1316 (10th Cir. 2007
  • no hearing required where court may resolve factual matters raised by Section 2255 petition on record
  • no hearing required where factual matters raised by Section 2255 petition may be resolved on record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holloway, McWilliams, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.