United States v. James Ronald Shelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a change in the legal standard for determining insanity did not amount to “newly discovered evidence”
• holding that the discovery of a change to a legal standard is not “newly discovered evidence” supporting a motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).