United States v. James R. George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that despite the fact that the jury submitted 65 written questions to the court, the court employed proper formal procedures in that the questions were discussed with the attorneys and ruled upon by the judge
• holding that despite the fact that the jury submitted 65 written questions to the court, the court employed proper formal procedures in that the questions were discussed with the attorneys and ruled upon by the judge
• holding that despite the fact that the jury submitted 65 written questions to the court, the court employed proper formal procedures in that the questions were discussed with the attorneys and ruled upon by the judge
• finding no prejudice where jurors directed questions to the bench and, if the court deemed the question proper, the witness was instructed to answer it
• finding no prejudice where jurors directed questions to the bench and, if the court deemed the question proper, the witness was instructed to answer it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).