United States v. James R. Downing, Samuel Ward, Daniel Drucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that appellate court maximizes probative value of uncharged crime evidence and minimizes its prejudice in reviewing district court decision to admit
• “Absent evidence to the contrary, we must presume that juries understand and abide by a district court’s limiting instructions.”
• “Absent evidence to the contrary, we 5 must presume that juries understand and abide by a district court’s limiting instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).