Skip to main content
· 12/21/1995

United States v. James P. Shoffner

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 1429
  • 43 Fed. R. Serv. 666
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36097
  • 1995 WL 752899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding unfair prejudice did not outweigh probative value of admitting details of a defendant’s prior crime
  • finding evidence indicating previous involvement in large-scale distribution activities sufficiently similar to present charge of involvement in large-scale distribution activities
  • finding evidence indicating previous involvement in large-scale distribution activities sufficiently similar to present charge of involvement in large-scale distribution activities
  • involvement in marijuana dealing under different circumstances tends to prove knowledge in marijuana conspiracy prosecution
  • six-year-old marijuana growing conviction admissible to show knowledge and intent of defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute marijuana
  • “We reverse only if we conclude that ‘no reasonable jury could have found [the defendant] guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.