United States v. James Neal Kinslow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding armed robbery is per se a crime of “dishonesty” under Fed. R.Evid. 609(a)(2)
• \The term 'transaction' is to be interpreted flexibly and may comprehend a series of related occurrences.\
• 'In this circuit, a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. y 2423 exists if the immoral activity is 'one of the dominant purposes' of the transportation.' (quoting United States v. Fox, 425 F.2d 996, 999 (9th Cir. 1970))
• “In this circuit, a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2423 exists if the immoral activity is ‘one of the dominant purposes’ of the transportation. It is not necessary, therefore, that the immoral activity be the only purpose of the trip.” (quoting Fox, 425 F.2d at 999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).