United States v. James Neal Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that vacatur of a judgment based on a post-judgment change in law is \akin to a reversal for trial error\
• reasoning that because vacatur of a plea in such circumstances “is akin to a reversal for trial error,” the defendant’s “retrial does not reflect the evils at which the Double Jeopardy Clause is aimed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).