United States v. James Michael Giuliano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unlike Linden, there might have been other witnesses available who could have been produced to contradict the Government’s evidence other than the defendant
• unlike Linden, in his remark, the district attorney was pointing to his own evidence and not to the defendant; in addition, other potential witnesses were available
• the prosecution’s remarks “dealt with the Government’s affirmative position and not with some completely stupid trick of advising the jury-that the defendant had not testified in his own behalf.”
• general comment on Government’s affirmative case is permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).