Skip to main content
· 3/10/1998

United States v. James Mandell Lewis

Citations

  • 138 F.3d 840
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1226
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4144
  • 1998 WL 101779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where challenged conviction is part of a package, a court may abrogate the entire plea agreement including unchallenged counts of conviction
  • holding district court has authority to vacate entire plea agreement when a conviction that is part of the plea package is vacated in habeas action based on later Supreme Court precedent rendering evidence of conviction insufficient
  • the parties had a \mutually mistaken belief ... that the evidence supported the section 924(c) count\
  • the parties had a “mutually mistaken belief . . . that the evidence supported the section 924(c) count”
  • permitting rescission of plea on the basis of “mutual mistake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Brorby, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.