United States v. James M. Eliason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that two invalid reasons to reject a claimant's 4 testimony were harmless error where the ALJ articulated two other reasons supported by 5 substantial evidence in the record
• affirming denial of Kasitgar hearing where defendant volunteered information hoping for favorable treatment
• affirming denial of Kasitgar hearing where defendant volunteered information hoping for favorable treatment
• affirming denial of Kasitgar hearing where defendant volunteered information hoping for favorable treatment
• “A complaint need not identify the statutory or 4 constitutional source of the claim raised in order to survive a motion to dismiss.”
• “If the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 4 interpretation, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner.” (citations 5 omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).