Skip to main content
· 4/23/2002

United States v. James L. Mooring

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 725
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7386
  • 2002 WL 656068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the timing deadline of 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1) was not jurisdictional so “the rules of waiver and forfeiture apply to [the provision]”
  • “Having considered the case law on each side, we conclude the prosecution’s noncompliance with § 851(a)(1) does not affect the court’s jurisdiction.”
  • “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”
  • “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”
  • “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, McMillian, Fagg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.