· 4/23/2002
United States v. James L. Mooring
Citations
- 287 F.3d 725
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7386
- 2002 WL 656068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the timing deadline of 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1) was not jurisdictional so “the rules of waiver and forfeiture apply to [the provision]”
- “Having considered the case law on each side, we conclude the prosecution’s noncompliance with § 851(a)(1) does not affect the court’s jurisdiction.”
- “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”
- “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”
- “if the error is jurisdictional, the error may be raised on collateral review without being subjected to procedural default analysis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hansen, McMillian, Fagg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.