United States v. James Kennedy Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court was correct in determining that speculative allegations of improper communications between jury and a juror's spouse did not warrant further investigation
• concluding that district court was correct in determining that speculative allegations of improper communications between jury and a juror’s spouse did not warrant further investigation
• allegation that a juror’s husband was present in the jury room was too vague to warrant further investigation
• allegation that a juror's husband was present in the jury room was too vague to warrant further investigation
• juror comments that “I’ve heard all of this I need to hear” and “this is just a bunch of crap” insufficient to impeach jury’s verdict
• juror comments that “I’ve heard all of this I need to hear” and “this is just a bunch of crap” insufficient to impeach jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).