United States v. James (\Jake\) Rohrer, United States of America v. John Bump

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indictment alleging that the conspiracy extended until “at least” 1980 was sufficient
• items admissible even though found more than a year after date Government alleged as date conspiracy ended
• “Although the credibility of a witness, unlike his competency, is a question for the jury, admission of expert psychiatric .testimony bearing on credibility lies in the judge’s discretion.”
• possible effects of drug usage by testifying witness
• possible effects of drug usage by testifying witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).