· 7/30/1993
United States v. James J. Coyne, Jr.
Citations
- 4 F.3d 100
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19723
- 1993 WL 285338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting challenge to jury instruction that defendant must be found to have accepted or solicited a thing of value \at least in part\ for or because of his intent to be influenced
- upholding denial of pattern or 5 practice claim where evidence reflected that violence was not 6 nationwide and that Catholics in many parts of Indonesia were 7 free to practice their faith
- “[T]he trial judge is in the best position to weigh competing interests in deciding whether or not to admit certain evidence.”
- “[I]t is sufficient if the public official understands that he or she is expected as a result of the payment to exercise particular kinds of influence . . . as specific opportunities arise.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Graafeiland, Winter, Pollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.