Skip to main content
· 8/5/1994

United States v. James Hurley Bowling

Citations

  • 32 F.3d 326
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20245
  • 1994 WL 407276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that manufacturer's name stamped on firearm was not \a statement of fact\ subject to hearsay rule
  • holding that manufacturerʹs name stamped on firearm was not ʺa statement of factʺ subject to hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Henley, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.