United States v. James Hughes Cheape, John Wade Johnson, Karen Klinefelter. Appeal of Karen Klinefelter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the jury found that the defendant’s “actions were wilful, and not the product of coercion or duress”
• finding that district court erred in concluding that the jury's rejection of coercion defense precluded the court from finding coercion to be a mitigating fac- tor
• vacating and remanding for resentencing because district court misapprehended its authority to depart under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12
• applying rule against superfluities to Sentencing Guidelines
• applying rule against superfluities to Sentencing Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).