United States v. James Hillsman, A/K/A Sampson, Winfred Owens, A/K/A Winfrey Owens, and Jaime Quezada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the consideration of relevant conduct did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments where the conduct was proven by a preponderance of the reliable evidence
• concluding that the consideration of relevant conduct did not violate the Fifth and Sixth Amendments where the conduct was proven by a preponderance of the reliable evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).