· 8/2/1972
United States v. James Hill
Citations
- 470 F.2d 361
- 152 U.S. App. D.C. 213
- 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The court may instruct the jury that it may consider a defendant’s interest in the outcome of the trial in evaluating his testimony
- assault with a dangerous weapon conviction vacated when appellant also convicted of assault with intent to kill while armed as a result of the same event
- assault with a dangerous weapon conviction vacated when appellant also convicted of assault with intent to kill while armed as a result of the same event
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Leventhal, MacKinnon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.