Skip to main content
· 8/2/1972

United States v. James Hill

Citations

  • 470 F.2d 361
  • 152 U.S. App. D.C. 213
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The court may instruct the jury that it may consider a defendant’s interest in the outcome of the trial in evaluating his testimony
  • assault with a dangerous weapon conviction vacated when appellant also convicted of assault with intent to kill while armed as a result of the same event
  • assault with a dangerous weapon conviction vacated when appellant also convicted of assault with intent to kill while armed as a result of the same event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Leventhal, MacKinnon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.