United States v. James Henry Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two co-conspirators’ hearsay statements were admissible when corroborated by each other and by circumstantial evidence
• holding that the district court did not clearly err by relying on statements by co-conspirators because the statements were corroborated by both each other and circumstantial evidence
• reviewing whether hearsay statements “were supported by sufficient indicia of reliability” for clear error
• at sentencing, co-conspirators’ statements “required, as hearsay, sufficient indicia of reliability in order to support the district court’s conclusion”
• reviewing reliability of co-defendants’ hearsay statements introduced through law-enforcement testimony
• enumerating possible forms of participation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).