United States v. James Harvey Brown, Also Known as Jim Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the Supreme Court merely approved Nevada’s ‘substantial likelihood’ standard ... but did not mandate it as a constitutional minimum necessary to justify a judicially-imposed restriction on attorney speech”
• defendant state official's appeal of gag order was collateral to the criminal action pending against him
• “[T]his Court and other Courts of Appeals have repeatedly held, in both civil and criminal trials, that gag orders imposed on members of the press are appealable under the collateral order doctrine.” (collecting cases)
• appeal by defendant politician contesting validity of gag order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).