United States v. James Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that indictment was sufficient notwithstanding omission of an element where reference to the criminal statute was made and the defendant was not prejudiced
• finding the indictment satisfactory because it charged the offense’s elements “by referenc[ing] [] the statute”
• “By reference to the statute it is within reason to construe the indictment to charge a crime . . .”
• “[t]he threshold determination should be whether counsel’s comments can be reasonably construed to be based on personal belief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).