United States v. James Fox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an unjustified five-month delay between trial and jury selection was a violation
• “Trial normally ‘commences’ for purposes of the [Speedy Trial] Act with the voir dire of the jury.”
• dismissal of the indictment was warranted when the jury was sworn five months after voir dire and no reason for the delay was placed of record
• Speedy Trial Act was violated where the district court delayed the evidentiary phase of the trial five-and-a- half months but failed to put any justification for doing so on the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).