· 12/17/2002
United States v. James Everette Worrell
Citations
- 313 F.3d 867
- 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25906
- 2002 WL 31819675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that capacity to control actions is not relevant to sanity inquiry
- explaining that capacity to control actions is not relevant to sanity inquiry
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Traxler, Hamilton, Hilton, Eastern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.