United States v. James Edward Osment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court's failure to advise defendant of effect of supervised-release term could not be deemed harmless, because in worst-case scenario, defendant's total potential imprisonment could exceed maximum prison sentence described by court at plea hearing
• explaining that Rule 11 requires explanation of the consequences of a violation of supervised release
• holding the failure to advise a defendant of the effect of supervised release was not harmless error where the ultimate sentence, including the term of supervised release, was greater than the potential maximum penalty of which the district court advised the defendant
• holding the failure to advise a defendant of the effect of supervised release was not harmless error where the ultimate sentence, including the term of supervised release, was greater than the potential maximum penalty of which the district court advised the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).