United States v. James Edward Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a potential error in admitting Rule 404(b) evidence was harmless because of the presence of DNA evidence
• “The right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment applies only to ‘critical stages’ of the proceedings against the defendant.” (citing Wade, 388 U.S. at 224–25)
• “The right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment applies only to ‘critical stages’ of the proceedings against the defendant.” (citing Wade, 388 U.S. at 224–25)
• “[T]he collection of the buccal swab and the Government’s subsequent use of the DNA results did not violate Lewis’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).