Skip to main content
· 2/5/1981

United States v. James Earnest Kreczmer

Citations

  • 636 F.2d 108
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that intellect was not affected by influence of drugs was not clearly erroneous
  • finding that intellect was not affected by influence of drugs was not clearly erroneous
  • evaluating confession to show that defendant was able to speak in a rational manner
  • evaluating confession to show that defendant was able to speak in a rational manner
  • credibility choice involving conflicting evidence as to whether police agent gave defendant Miranda warnings is for the trial judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krayitch, Hill, Kravitch, Hatch-Ett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.