Skip to main content
· 12/21/1990

United States v. James E. Dyer

Citations

  • 922 F.2d 105
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22181
  • 1990 WL 211626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating specific jury instruction may be reviewed in isolation if \it is so far removed from the standards set by the law that the appellate court is convinced that the jury might have been misled\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • \[A] jury charge must be viewed as a whole and in the context of the entire trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Pratt, Griesa, Southern, York

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.