United States v. James E. Corr, Iii, and Roger Drayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Sperling challenge when evidence that defendant was a conspiracy member was “overwhelming”
• in prosecution for making false statement to government agency, the defendant’s interpretation of the government’s questions was issue for jury
• SEC release or announcement notifying public of certain facts was not a determination of facts by the agency obtained after administrative proceedings, and thus was outside of 803(8)(C) hearsay exception
• evidence sufficient to go to jury on question of whether defendant in securities prosecution was a “control person,” even though another person owned a majority of the stock of company in question
• duplicative evidence may be excluded in court’s discretion
• duplicative evidence may be excluded in court’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).