United States v. James Dell Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence that physician had sex with patient and simultaneously prescribed drugs for her sufficient to support inference that sexual favors motivated prescriptions
• prosecutor’s closing contained some improprieties albeit not 25 purposeful or flagrant or requiring reversal
• prosecutor’s argument neutralized when court gave cautionary instructions and defense made similar comments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).