United States v. James Dean Rood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court erred by declining to grant the defendant the one-level decrease on the ground that he violated the conditions of his pretrial release
• “[G]ranting the additional one-level decrease in Section 3E1.1(b) is not discretionary where [the] defendant satisfies the [G]uideline’s criteria.”
• “[G]ranting the additional one-level decrease in Section 3E1.1(b) is not discretionary where defendant satisfies the guideline’s criteria.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).