Skip to main content
· 2/21/1990

United States v. James Darrell Westbrook, A/K/A Jimmy, United States of America v. Shelia Yvonne Westbrook, A/K/A Shelia Yvonne Thorson

Citations

  • 896 F.2d 330
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 1048
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2462
  • 1990 WL 14674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing drug identification testimony by lay witnesses based on their having used the substance in question and experienced its effects
  • stating circumstantial evidence of a drug's identity may include opinion testimony of a witness who has experience with the substance
  • allowing drug identification testimony by lay witnesses based on their having used the substance in question and experienced its effects
  • permitting ex-users to testify as to the identity of a controlled substance based upon their past experience with same
  • two witnesses used substance at issue and had extensive previous use
  • two lay witnesses who were heavy amphetamine users were properly per- mitted to testify that a substance was amphetamine; but it was error to permit another witness to make such an identification where she had no experience with amphetamines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Arnold, McMillan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.