United States v. James C. Quinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in light of defendant’s failure to demonstrate prejudice, that district court did not abuse its discretion in permitting testimony of undisclosed expert testimony
• affirming defendant’s sentence where officer Thomas, 99 Fed. Appx. 665, 668-69 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing testified that amount of drugs was more consistent with distribution than with personal use
• “[E]xtrinsic evidence used to impeach a witness on an irrelevant collateral matter” is inadmissible.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).