Skip to main content
· 1/28/1986

United States v. James C. Curtis

Citations

  • 782 F.2d 593
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 1219
  • 57 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 753
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming lower court's grant of motion in limine to exclude expert testimony on unsettled nature of tax law regarding willfulness
  • excluding expert testimony that an area of tax law was unsettled and complex in the absence of evidence that the defendant himself was confused or relied on the expert’s advice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krupansky, Milburn, Joiner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.