Skip to main content
· 8/15/2001

United States v. James C. Coutchavlis

Citations

  • 260 F.3d 1149
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 8679
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7070
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18363
  • 2001 WL 914197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a judge’s comments on burden of proof must be viewed in the context of the entire case
  • affirming conviction for disorderly conduct where behavior -took place on a public road in a national park, even though no members of the public were present
  • “That the magistrate judge did not orally explain his reasoning with the precision that might be expected from a written decision is not sufficient reason to conclude that he placed the burden on the defendant to prove his innocence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Graber, McKeown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.