· 8/15/2001
United States v. James C. Coutchavlis
Citations
- 260 F.3d 1149
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 8679
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7070
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18363
- 2001 WL 914197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a judge’s comments on burden of proof must be viewed in the context of the entire case
- affirming conviction for disorderly conduct where behavior -took place on a public road in a national park, even though no members of the public were present
- “That the magistrate judge did not orally explain his reasoning with the precision that might be expected from a written decision is not sufficient reason to conclude that he placed the burden on the defendant to prove his innocence . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Graber, McKeown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.