Skip to main content
· 10/16/1985

United States v. James C. Ausmus, Jr.

Citations

  • 774 F.2d 722
  • 19 Fed. R. Serv. 761
  • 56 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6179
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding in income tax evasion case that prejudice prong of Strickland was not met where defendant admitted on cross-examination that his failure to pay income taxes “was not accidental, negligent, or inadvertent”
  • “Professional standards do not require counsel to disbelieve a client and check with other sources unless counsel has a basis for such disbelief.”
  • “Professional standards do not require counsel to disbelieve a client and check with other sources unless counsel has a basis for such disbelief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Krupansky, Weick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.