United States v. James B. Cardwell, United States of America v. Marvin Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting partial suppression but finding that no portion of the warrant could withstand particularity and probable cause challenges
• “‘[L]imiting’ the search to only records that are evidence of the violation of a certain statute is generally not enough.”
• limiting search to records that are evidence of violation of certain statute generally not enough
• “Nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “ ‘limiting’ the search to only records that are evidence of the violation of a certain statute is generally not enough”
• courts must “consider the totality of circumstances in determining the validity of a warrant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).